| 000 | 03964cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 17271752 | ||
| 005 | 20250509124957.0 | ||
| 008 | 120425s2013 enk b 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | _a 2012017169 | ||
| 020 | _a9781107025127 (hardback) | ||
| 040 |
_aDLC _cDLC _dDLC |
||
| 042 | _apcc | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aK3611.G46 _bB54 2013 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a344.03/21 _223 |
| 084 |
_aLAW046000 _2bisacsh |
||
| 100 |
_aAnoop K. Kaushal _eAuthor |
||
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aMedical negligence & legal remedies/ _cAnoop K. Kaushal |
| 260 |
_aNew Delhi _aNew delhi _bLexisNexis _c2016. |
||
| 300 |
_axliii, 2682 p. ; _c24 cm. |
||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 8 | _aMachine generated contents note: 1. Introduction - when criminal law encounters bioethics: a case of tensions and incompatibilities or an apt forum for resolving ethical conflict? Amel Alghrani, Rebecca Bennett and Suzanne Ost; Part I. Death, Dying, and the Criminal Law: 2. Euthanasia and assisted suicide should, when properly performed by a doctor in an appropriate case, be decriminalised John Griffiths; 3. Five flawed arguments for decriminalising euthanasia John Keown; 4. Euthanasia excused: between prohibition and permission Richard Huxtable; Part II. Freedom and Autonomy: When Consent Is Not Enough: 5. Body integrity identity disorder - a problem of perception? Robert Smith; 6. Risky sex and 'manly diversions': the contours of consent in HIV transmission and rough horseplay cases David Gurnham; 7. 'Consensual' sexual activity between doctors and patients: a matter for the criminal law? Suzanne Ost and Hazel Biggs; Part III. Criminalising Biomedical Science: 8. 'Scientists in the dock': regulating science Amel Alghrani and Sarah Chan; 9. Bioethical conflict and developing biotechnologies: is protecting individual and public health from the risks of xenotransplantation a matter for the (criminal) law? Sara Fovargue; 10. The criminal law and enhancement - none of the law's business? Nishat Hyder and John Harris; 11. Dignity as a socially constructed value Stephen Smith; Part IV. Bioethics and Criminal Law in the Dock: 12. Can English law accommodate moral controversy in medicine? Lessons from abortion Margaret Brazier; 13. The case for decriminalising abortion in Northern Ireland Marie Fox; 14. The impact of the loss of deference towards the medical profession Jose; Miola; 15. Criminalising medical negligence David Archard; 16. All to the good? Criminality, politics, and public health John Coggon; 17. Moral controversy, human rights and the common law judge Brenda Hale. | |
| 520 |
_a"Who should define what constitutes ethical and lawful medical practice? Judges? Doctors? Scientists? Or someone else entirely? This volume analyses how effectively criminal law operates as a forum for resolving ethical conflict in the delivery of health care. It addresses key questions such as: how does criminal law regulate controversial bioethical areas? What effect, positive or negative, does the use of criminal law have when regulating bioethical conflict? And can the law accommodate moral controversy? By exploring criminal law in theory and in practice and examining the broad field of bioethics as opposed to the narrower terrain of medical ethics, it offers balanced arguments that will help readers form reasoned views on the ethical legitimacy of the invocation and use of criminal law to regulate medical and scientific practice and bioethical issues"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
||
| 650 | 0 |
_aGenetic engineering _xLaw and legislation _xCriminal provisions. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aMedical genetics _xLaw and legislation _xCriminal provisions. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aBiotechnology _xLaw and legislation _xCriminal provisions. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aBioethics. | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aLAW / Health. _2bisacsh |
|
| 906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cBK _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c316 _d316 |
||